Movie Review: The Internship (Tuesday, June 25, 2013)

This is not a movie I would typically go see. I don't really like comedy, particularly of the stupid juvenile sort that Vince Vaughn and Owen Wilson are known for. But, this is a movie about Google, and I figure as a Noogler, I should see the movie, so when people I know ask me about it, I can answer intelligently. Also, Google bought us all tickets for this morning's showing.

The movie has some really great moments, and honestly, it's not a bad story. But it's also got some of those typical Vaughn and Wilson moments that just make me want to exit the theater - like overuse of Alanis Morissette's song Ironic (irony: writing a song called Ironic where none of the situations mentioned are examples of irony).

I liked most of the "hero" characters in the film, and the antagonists, are of course, detestable. The geeks are sufficiently geeky, and there are some truly spectacular moments of nerdiness. The film is decidedly non-technical, but there are plenty of references to Google products. There was one great moment where Owen Wilson interrupts a seminar to ask why they don't change the default editor in Ubuntu from vi to Emacs. Of course, if it had really been a roomful of geeks, that would have resulted in violence as the vi geeks battled it out with the Emacs geeks. And then there was a wonderful scene involving a game of Muggle Quidditch. I want to know why there was no Muggle Quidditch and my Noogler orientation??

Large portions of the film take place at recognizable locations on Google's Mountain View campus, though there were a few significant departures from reality. For example, a character couldn't name any nearby restaurants because she doesn't get out much, but in reality, there's actually no place to eat near Google's campus, and anyway, they serve three meals a day on campus, so no one really bothers to go out anyway. It looks like most of the "going out" in the film ended up in San Francisco - more than an hour away from campus, even in light traffic. Still those are minor nits. The major departure is that this film is some weird combination of Google's internship program, Noogler orientation, and interview candidate's worst nightmare. It just doesn't work that way.

But who cares? That's not the point. They're telling a story. The film has the typical cliché moments of rejection and redemption, and the formula is nothing new. But if you think Google would be your dream job, or you like absurd comedy, then you might get a kick out of it.

Movie Review: Kick-Ass (Saturday, April 24, 2010)

Wow. First and foremost, Chloë Grace Moretz steals the show as Hit-Girl, an 11 year old with some of the baddest Kung Fu and heaviest fire power around. Oh yeah, and the plot is pretty good, too. Dave, a stereotypical high school nerd, is musing with his friends about why no one goes out and becomes a superhero, and eventually decides that he should do just that. He ends up getting in way over his head, and gets his ass kicked, repeatedly. But then the real superheros show up, and a war ensues. The plot is fairly intricate, and for an action movie, the characters offer a lot of depth. Nick Cage is as bizarre as usual, but fortunately he doesn't overpower the rest of the cast. The film is every comic book nerd's dream, in full color, and at full speed. Did I mention? Wow.

Movie Review: Inkheart (Monday, February 9, 2009)

Inkheart, based on the German novel by Cornelia Funke, represents my favorite sort of literary fairy tale. The film tells the story of a "Silvertongue", played by Brendan Fraser, who can bring the written word to life, just by reading it aloud. Before the movie begins, he unwittingly brings to life the villain Capricorn, played by Andy Serkis, who brought us Gollum and King Kong. Serkis's performance is delightfully evil. The film is well acted, the settings are beautiful, and the special effects are seamless and magical throughout the film. The film alternates between scary and funny, in true Brendan Fraser fashion, and moves along very well, never leaving you bored, and without moving at such a fast pace it feels like you're being dragged along behind a bus. Despite being highly abbreviated from the book (so I'm told), the movie still makes sense, and does a very good job of rapidly and clearly explaining the back story, and everything else that's happening, as the story moves along. The only downside for me, is the wanton destruction of so many books throughout the film. How could they?! It is a delightful film, and highly recommended.

Movie Review: The Tale of Despereaux (Friday, December 26, 2008)

One might question my maturity, but I just get a kick out of fairy tale movies. This story, "of a mouse, a princess, some soup, and a spool of thread" (as the book, by Kate DiCamillo, on which the movie is based, is subtitled), was terrific. The animation in this swashbuckling romance adventure was very solid, and the characters were excellently voiced by an all-star cast, including Emma Watson, Kevin Kline, Dustin Hoffman, Matthew Broderick, Christopher Lloyd. The musical score was very dramatic... you could almost forget that the hero is a mouse, except that they keep reminding you that he's very abnormal for a mouse. On several occasions, Despereaux is accused of being more man than mouse. When asks what he is, he replies that he is a gentleman. He's definitely my kind of mouse — a noble gentlemen, with a quest, who knows no fear, and has an unhealthy obsession with storybooks. Now all I need to do, is find myself a copy of the book, so I can enjoy it all over again.

Movie Review: The City of Ember (Monday, October 20, 2008)

When I first saw the previews for this film, it looked both dark and original, so of course, I immediately went to the library, and read Jeanne DuPrau's novel on which the film is based. The book was terrific, but aimed at a younger audience than I'd expected. The film loosely follows the book, with only a few major changes. The book starred two rather clever twelve-year-olds, while the characters in the movie seemed a few years older. But considering that the story occurs right at their "coming of age", moving that up a few years makes it easier for the audience to relate (we don't generally see a twelve-year-old as an adult, and that would be difficult to act). Despite being a few years older, I think that the personalities of the characters were captured fairly well, particularly Lena, who loves to run! I was disappointed by the addition of a parent conspiracy plot. The book, while simple, was complex enough without that. I think the main duo appear much stronger when they do everything on their own, rather than having to follow in the footsteps of some adults. Again, I imagine the producers just couldn't bear to give adult responsibilities and ideas to these young heroes. Bill Murray is great as the mayor, and by and large the acting throughout is very good. As usual, the places where the movie has trouble are the places where they deviated from the book. Some of the changes defy comprehension, like the mutant mole, and an ending that stretches plausibility. I imagine that the changes were made in an effort to appeal to an older audience than in the book, but I think that could have been done through strong directing and strong acting, both of which were apparent, without the need for "creative" writing. It's that creative writing that is causing a great storybook to fizzle at the box office, when it should be thriving from audiences young an old who have some imagination, and just a bit of curiosity. Skip the movie. Read the book.

Movie Review: Star Wars: The Clone Wars (Friday, August 22, 2008)

George Lucas's latest exploitation of our beloved franchise has received reviews that are somewhat unfavorable. Actually, it seems that most reviewers hated it. Roger Ebert closes his review with the question, "how do Hutts copulate?" We don't want to know. And we wish we didn't have to think about it. Yet, we are forced to, as the plot, even weaker than usual, focuses on Jabba the Hutt's infant son.

I was pretty sure we were in for trouble, when the movie began as expected, but then, instead of John Williams' famous score, we were greeted by similar, but obviously different music, and then instead of the venerable introductory crawl, we get a voice over... as though the audience is either too dumb, or more likely, too young, to read a few short paragraphs of text.

But perhaps I judged too hastily. The movie jumps immediately into animated action. Ebert did not appreciate the animation of the movie. I found it spectacular. While George Lucas's computer generated imagery ranges from jarring in the prequels to horrifying in the "Special Editions", the same techniques are used here to stunning effect. As a fan of Japanese Animation, I was pleased to see all of the action fully animated, and the action was, at times, breathtaking.

Unfortunately, the movie suffers from a weak overall plot, and while the scenes were, in general, good, the writers could not resist adding a number of Jar-Jar-esque elements that would make even the most liberal of fans want to cry. The battle droids were endowed with even more obnoxiousness and less battle ability than in the prequels, and Jabba the Hutt's uncle reminded me continuously of South Park's Eric Cartman. And it's not a subtle reminder either. It's painful.

On the bright side, Jabba's infant son has no dialog, and despite his central role in the plot, he doesn't ruin the film. The film also introduces a 14 year old Togruta female, Ahsoka Tano, who is assigned as Padawan to a less than enthusiastic Anakin Skywalker. Shockingly, the character is witty, talented, and quite endearing.

With the exception of Anakin, Obiwan, Ahsoka, and a handful of senior clone troopers, nearly all of the dialog in the movie could be removed, and the movie would be much improved. The female villain Ventress is also very slick, but some of the characters we've met before, such as Amidala and Yoda, are poorly executed and add little to the film.

Once again, George Lucas has focused on creating a visual masterpiece, but has totally messed up on the plot and script. The visuals make the film worth seeing — on DVD or possibly a matinee, if you can catch it before it's yanked from theaters. Just be prepared to ignore most of the dialog. This will be another great opportunity for the Phantom Editor, if he can prune it down to about an hour and replace the score with John Williams' classic composition, and create a tolerable short film.

Movie Review: Mr. and Mrs. Smith (Monday, July 4, 2005)

Mr. and Mrs. Smith is an unlikely story about a couple who are each professional killers who each think the other is just a regular person. It has all the usual shoot 'em up, car chasing, body count action sequences you would expect from a film with that premise, but at the same time it manages to poke a little fun at itself and stay witty and upbeat through most of the film. As outlandish as the story is, it is easy to suspend disbelief for most of it. An interesting aspect is that John and Jane both seem to be heavy drinkers — she drinks Johnny Walker Red Label Whiskey among other things, and John (a man after my own heart) seems to be exclusively attached to Bombay Sapphire martinis. One of the few issues I had with the film is that Jane Smith's agency smacks just a bit too much of Charlie's Angels, which is silly in the context of the rest of the movie. I heard a review on the radio the other week criticizing the film for having a violent physical exchange between Jane and John turn into a passionate love scene, as though that somehow shows some tacit approval of domestic violence. That's nonsense. The scene makes perfect sense within the context of the film, and is perfectly understandable to anyone who is at least aware of the existence of sadomasochism as a reasonable form of pleasure (even if it isn't perhaps for everyone). The only other criticism that I have is the final gun battle: first, it went on way too long (though that might have been the 32 ounce soda); and second, why is it that only John and Jane have decent bulletproof vests, but everyone else may as well be dressed in pink lace? Nevertheless, the movie is a lot of fun, and a worthy escape to two hours of killer fantasy.

Movie Review: Howl's Moving Castle (Saturday, June 11, 2005)

Hayao Miyazaki has produced yet another masterpiece. In Howl's Moving Castle, a young lady, Sophie, is magically transformed into an elderly woman and falls in with a dashing (okay, he's freakin' gorgeous) wizard named Howl, who has a bizarre relationship with a fire demon and lives in a house... on legs. The setting looks like an early 20th century Europe in places that hadn't quite caught up to the new time period yet. The scenery is very pretty, the characters are very cool. Surprisingly, the movie was in Japanese with English subtitles, but I'm hoping for an English language dub before it is released on DVD. There is a lot going on in the movie and characters are trying to accomplish certain goals and do certain things... but I had some trouble following it... still, it was cool, even if you aren't quite sure what's going on. Like most Miyazaki films, Joe Hisaishi did the score and the music during the closing credits is wonderful. I was somewhat disappointed that his music didn't come out more during the rest of the film, however, and there were a couple of scenes that might have reduced me to tears if Hisaishi's work had been brought out a little bit more. So while it doesn't beat out Spirited Away or Laputa, it is still wonderful and highly recommended!

Movie Review: French Kiss (Monday, May 17, 2004)

This romantic comedy with Kevin Kline and Meg Ryan is very charming. Kline's French accent and dialog really make the show. Meg Ryan is traveling in France to attempt to reclaim her cheating bastard fiancee, but has a string of misfortune, and eventually falls in with Kline's character who starts out trying to scam her, but eventually, well, it's a romantic comedy, and the cheating bastard fiancee does not provide any romance. Produced by Meg Ryan, she plays her usual self, and includes some pretty base Meg Ryan gags. But most of the humor is of the witty variety, often focusing on Ryan's inability to speak French, or Kline's French accent. And unlike so many movies these days, it has a wonderful happy ending! Definitely a movie to add to my collection, if I ever see it for sale.

Movie Review: Troy (Monday, May 17, 2004)

Let me just say: Brad Pitt rules my world. He makes a serious bad-ass as Achilles. Peter Jackson could take some lessons for this movie: you'll note, there were no Elves at the siege on Troy. The same was true of Helm's Deep. Okay, there was one — Orlando Bloom. Too bad he plays a wuss. He's a pretty wuss, but still a wuss. Speaking of pretty, oh my god, there are some fine babes in this film. And they, along with Brad Pitt, spend most of the film mostly naked. But basically, everyone but Orlando Bloom kicks ass. There is lots of cool eye candy, including a vast armada, and lots of fire. There was a little surgery I could have done without, but otherwise, despite the violence, the gore did not go over the top. Just as exciting as Gladiator, but with a prettier cast. A definite choice when it comes out on DVD.

Movie Review: Van Helsing (Sunday, May 9, 2004)

Van Helsing is a fun movie about vampires, werewolves, various monsters, and this guy, Van Helsing. We don't find out too much about him in the movie, but it seems like he's an interesting guy. Basically he goes around kicking the asses of 19th Century evil-doers, and in fantastic form. The movie centers around him travelling to Transylvania to help kill Dracula and end a curse on the family from which Dracula came. That part of it is pretty complicated, but mostly, it's really cool music, fighting, special effects, and so on. There are some church-y undertones that add to the creepiness-factor. These are a lot easier to swallow than the mish-mash of literary undertones. But who cares! Monsters exploding and vampires flying and some of the coolest werewolf transformations out there. It's not the most cerebral film in the world, but it sure is a lot of fun.

Movie Review: Happy Gilmore (Sunday, May 2, 2004)

Happy Gilmore is funny. Adam Sandler doesn't do anything gross or retarded. He's violent. But the story is that he's a really bad hockey player. And that would make him violent. And he's able to temper his behaviour when necessary, and his whole motivation for golfing actually makes sense. It's one of the funniest movies I've ever seen — and all without being unnecessarily gross. And Happy's love interest is exceptionally nice to look at, and actually witty and intelligent. All in all, a funny movie about a bad hockey player turned pro golfer — he may be violent, but he's got a heart, and good intentions.

Movie Review: American Wedding (DVD) (Monday, April 26, 2004)

American Wedding is an over-the-top gross-out film. It is nevertheless well acted (flamboyant Bear, in particular) and well scripted. For the crowd that likes gross-out gags, there's no question of the appeal. For those of us who avoid gross-out gags when at all possible, it takes a little more effort. Jim and Michelle are finally going to get married — they're very much in love, and we wish them well. Stifler is left uninvited to the wedding, and when he finds out and invites himself, the desire for his absence becomes quite clear. Much of the movie focuses on Stifler causing trouble and trying to get with Michelle's sister Cadence (played by hottie, January Jones). Despite all the antics, Stifler does redeem himself in fine fashion, and everyone lives happily ever after. In particular, Jim realizes the reason he always seems to be in trouble, but have everything work out in the end, is because his friends are always there to stand by him. Despite the gross-out humor, many of the points ring very true, if you care to spend the brain cells to look for that sort of thing.

Movie Review: The Punisher (Monday, April 26, 2004)

The Punisher is pleasingly dark. The theatre was handing out reprints of the Spider-Man issue in which the Punisher first appeared, which made for interesting reading during the commercials preceding the movie. This Marvel comic adaptation begins by introducing you to the happy life of Frank Castle in an undercover sting operation where a couple of arms dealers get killed. It is going to be Castle's last job, and he and his beautiful family are going to live happily ever after. Unfortunately, the bad guys figure out who Castle is, hunt him down, and in a sick display kill off his family. Somehow, Castle himself manages to survive, and after nursing himself back to health, sets out to punish those responsible.

Castle is understandably cold and brutal throughout the film, but maintains his humanity with a desire not to kill indescriminantly, and his continuous bouts with himself and his misery over the loss of his family. He makes some interesting allies, and grows as a character throughout the film. The Punisher may not live happily ever after, but he walked away soundly enough for a sequal, which would be welcome if it continues to capture the mood that was present here.

Some of the high points include awesome fight sequences, a ruthless John Travolta, and an exciting rock soundtrack. This will be another definite addition to the DVD collection when it is released.

Movie Review: Hellboy (Saturday, April 3, 2004)

Hellboy is a fun adaptation of the Dark Horse comic book (at least to my eyes, never having read the comic book, though having heard many good things about it). The movie is a great mix of dark drama and dark comedy. It's very dark all around. That's probably why I enjoyed it. The main character, Hellboy, is a sort of demon creature who has some extraordinary abilities, such as being immune to fire. But he's got a very human desire to be "normal". Throughout the film, Hellboy keeps his horns filed down to stumps in his effort to fit in. It does a very good job of being funny, but at the same time making you feel sad for his situation. The basic plot involves a Nazi scheme to take over the world, and some pretty icky creatures that don't want to die. Hellboy keeps up a very witty dialog throughout his various encounters, though the humor is tempered somewhat by the writers' willingness to let characters die. The special effects are wonderful, and some of the imagery was absolutely remarkable -- to the point where it entered my dreams last night. This film will definitely enter my DVD collection, and it may even be worth seeing again.